Custom building or re-building RC transmitter gear
A thought that occurred to me recently: is it possible to use the spare parts that a lot of RC shops sell, or maybe a semi-dismantled RC transmitter handset, to make your own transmitter? As in, build something from an Arduino/BeagleBoard/Gumstix/custom PCB/whatever and then connect it to the transmitting part of the RC handset, at any level - either some handset that will accept some kind of data input and send it for you, or right down on the raw electronics end, soldering bits together.
Basically, I'd like to get some computer assistance into the loop, using telemetry data to allow the system to act like fly-by-wire software, tweaking and moderating the control inputs to stop the pilot from departing from a safe flight envelope. If done right, it should make the aircraft controllable with just one two-axis thumbstick, trading separate controls for all the surfaces for basic up-down/left-right and a throttle slider. I was just wondering if it would be at all possible to build this into the actual handset (ignoring for a moment the issue of how the telemetry data would get to said handset) so that I could use the tried and tested transmission method, rather than having to fight past the latency and patchy signal issues of something like an XBee.
If not, then hey, back to the drawing board I guess. This is still early concept stages, so no great loss.
Basically, I'd like to get some computer assistance into the loop, using telemetry data to allow the system to act like fly-by-wire software, tweaking and moderating the control inputs to stop the pilot from departing from a safe flight envelope. If done right, it should make the aircraft controllable with just one two-axis thumbstick, trading separate controls for all the surfaces for basic up-down/left-right and a throttle slider. I was just wondering if it would be at all possible to build this into the actual handset (ignoring for a moment the issue of how the telemetry data would get to said handset) so that I could use the tried and tested transmission method, rather than having to fight past the latency and patchy signal issues of something like an XBee.
If not, then hey, back to the drawing board I guess. This is still early concept stages, so no great loss.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Nicholas Budd on -
Well, the diagram of the entire project plan is here, but I get the impression that's not entirely what you meant. I'm working on a diagram of dataflow, ie following the system through, starting by explaining what each sensor is reading, then seeing what's reading from the sensors, what the software does with the data it's reading, what it sends signals out to in response and what those signals make the components do. I'll post that when I've finished it, but it's pretty big - as you can see, the planned system has a lot of stuff. That's the dream, the ultimate UAV system. It's possible that I'll never actually build all of it, and parts of it might not even be achievable, but I aim to build as much of it as I can. I haven't even got my EasyStar flying autonomously yet (or flying much at all, actually) but I'm already working on designs for an airframe to carry it all...
-
ModeratorPermalink Reply by Sgt Ric on -
I agree with MichaelSmith that "the ultimate UAV system" as you put it Nicholas, is not one that sends data down for "computer assistance" as you mentioned.
My idea of the ultimate UAV is one with even more computational ability onboard, not placing more on the ground.
Yes, human input is sometimes necessary, for safety override, updating mission, etc., but the less the better.
-
Permalink Reply by James Turner on -
Looks like a great project. You might be as well to build in a standard transmitter and receiver into your diagram just in case. It's fine manually controlling the autopilot until the autopilot/ground control/Xbee (or whatever) locks up and then you have problems. I'm doing a similar project but using a GCS and there have been many times during testing when I've needed to fall back to the more "traditional" ways within seconds. you also need to be very comfortable flying your plane manually too in case you have to rescue it from a glitch. better still, have a spotter with the backup rc.
-
DeveloperPermalink Reply by jasonshort on -
Why not generate PPM like a buddybox? Pipe that into a transmitter and you're good. Micheal's right. Everything else should/ is in the plane already.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next ›
Contests
Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The third round was a reliablilty/aerial photography round for both planes and copters, which is now closed. Stay tuned for the next round, beginning soon.A list of all T3 contests is here.
Top Content
Groups
-
Moderators
58 members
-
ArduCopter Evolution Team
106 members
-
Learning to program the …
54 members
-
UK Ardupilot Group
27 members
-
DIYDrones - CNC Project
59 members
© 2012 Created by Chris Anderson.
