Permalink Reply by Hector Fernadez on December 2, 2010 at 4:38pm
Permalink Reply by igal nassima on December 3, 2010 at 10:50pm
Permalink Reply by Hector Fernadez on December 6, 2010 at 4:46am
Permalink Reply by Wes Collins on September 21, 2011 at 2:46pm You might actually do better with a rigid hull design rather than a blimp. They have a tendency to have better handling characteristics and can hanndle being buffeted around by winds a bit more than a blimp can as you can mount stabilizer vectored thrust props in the upper and lower rudder to act as lateral thrust in winds plus you have hard points all over the airframe for equipment mounting (including better long term support for amorphous solar panels if you want to go all solar) and can even mount much of your desired equipment inside the keel to allow for less drag.
There is a guy just north of you, Hector, in LA I think, named Jack Clemens who built a 20' flight capable model of the USS Macon. He used balsa for his frame design, but lightweight plastics could provide better strength at the same or even less weight (just for a lot more money). The blimp would be cheaper to build, however the rigid frame would be a more robust design which will provide greater operational longevity.
Permalink Reply by Hector Fernadez on September 21, 2011 at 10:15pm Hi Wes, so much thanks for your comments, i will take hands on that information!
Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The third round was a reliablilty/aerial photography round for both planes and copters, which is now closed. Stay tuned for the next round, beginning soon.59 members
19 members
28 members
114 members
94 members
© 2012 Created by Chris Anderson.
