Stanford quadcopters rock!
We've enjoyed watching the development of Stanford's STARMAC II quadcopters, and this video does a good job of showing why: the 6 vehicles are light, incredibly accurate in both GPS and ultrasonic position sensing, and robust.
-
Comment by Jack Crossfire on July 3, 2008 at 2:36pm -
Less vibration. Less blade vortex interaction. Less weather vaning. Less exposed rotors. Really short flight time. All the money is in swarm & obstacle avoidance research. There's nothing in that research which actually requires aircraft.
-
Comment by Chris Anderson on July 3, 2008 at 2:53pm
-
Jack, can you clarify that a bit? What's less than what? Helis vs quadcopters?
-
Comment by Jack Crossfire on July 3, 2008 at 5:36pm
-
Helis vs quadcopters.
Comment
Top Content
Groups
-
ArduCopter User Group
478 members
-
ArduPlane User Group
299 members
-
ArduCopter (traditional …
77 members
-
ArduPilot (legacy) User …
77 members
-
Moderators
50 members
-
ROS User Group
31 members
-
Team Prometheus
11 members
© 2012 Created by Chris Anderson.
You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!
Join DIY Drones