A 3x2 propeller, another tuning of the PID & azimuth, & a lot of camera flashes got it up to 9 minutes. Previously, it was a 3x3 propeller. The motor stayed just cool enough.


Here, the battery hit 6.6V & started falling over.  Throttle started ramping up at that point.

Overheating still sometimes happens faster & it shows up as a throttle which diverges from battery voltage.


Here, the battery never fell over but was stable at 6.8V.  Throttle ramped up anyways, probably from motor overheating.

Meanwhile, it's a trip into history


as hardware from 2 years ago is recycled

into a new, much lighter, more reliable POV attachment.  The dust shows how long ago M.M. was.
The flight computer had to be rebuilt for the 1st time in 2 years.

Of note is a new etching technology seen on the Goog Tube.



Just float the board upside down on the FeCl.  Surface tension holds it up.  Slide it around to remove air bubbles & let it sit for 30 minutes.  The copper magically falls away as it's etched.  No need for heating, airating, stirring, or splashing FeCl in your eye.





Took 3 years of manual board etching to figure that out.




Magnet wire jumpers.


New & old, with conformal coating.


The 1st Marcy 1 board was made on Aug 25, 2009.


The 2nd Marcy 1 board was made on Dec 30, 2009.


The 1 that consumed most of our time was made on Jan 12, 2010.  So that was a 2 year old board.

So this is our 4th Marcy 1 board.  As much as possible was recycled from the old board.  Working with this ancient hardware of course reminded us of the peak of M.M..  That really feels like the peak.  We don't feel nearly as attached to Her as we did in that time.

Rediscovered the hard way that 32Mhz isn't enough to drive the radio.  It needs the 64Mhz clock.



The full magnetometer is on the wing.  It only does 120 samples/sec.  At the nominal flight speed, that's 20 samples/revolution.

Moved the LED to the wing & did some POV trickery so it could detect attitude during the takeoff.  The POV doesn't seem to interfere with the machine vision.


  Tried using a red LED again for the machine vision, without any luck.  The drop in brightness throws it off even in darkness.  In daylight, the POV overwhelms it.  Anything is going to require white LEDs & differences in luminance.
The original Marcy 1 had the LED on the wing, which may also have improved the coning angle situation.


Disappointing that we never found a use for 3D sonar.  Only a large blimp or a ground vehicle could have used it.  Sonar overall is a mess.  We once envisioned a network of receivers on a ceiling, allowing a UAV to travel anywhere in a building.  It was way too directional & slow.


It could fly a blimp.  There was once a blimp based courier system in an HP building.  They used a robotic blimp to send pieces of paper between cubes.  All we've done is make it cheaper.

Video can now do the job much better.


The long flight times & experience with how long you can expect stable flight got us the 1st flash photos.

Surface mount LEDs would be nice, but we can't afford $20 of shipping for $1 of LEDs.





 

There was also this video of the very 1st POV flights, with lousier tuning.

Views: 574


Moderator
Comment by Chris Anderson on January 28, 2012 at 9:48pm

Jaw on floor. You've outdone yourself on this one, and given your track record that's saying something. This is the gold standard of DIY!


Moderator
Comment by Jack Crossfire on January 29, 2012 at 2:17am

Thanks.  Too bad there are no jobs for autonomous monocopter light show designers.


Moderator
Comment by Gary Mortimer on January 29, 2012 at 3:52am

You could always go help those MIT folks and their flying lights http://www.suasnews.com/2010/02/5355/mit-researchers-develop-new-di... 

I have followed your work with great interest and am sorely tempted to have a go myself. I don't think mine would work, but this has my mind racing, plus one for what Chris said, flipping impressive. 

Comment by Rory Paul on January 30, 2012 at 9:57am

And once more I am amazed....I still want to know who IRL Major Marcy is...

Comment by Geoffrey L. Barrows on January 30, 2012 at 2:11pm

Jack- This is incredible work!


Moderator
Comment by Gary Mortimer on January 31, 2012 at 12:32pm

Jack I have been thinking a bit and that's always dangerous, do you think flap back will constrain forward flight speeds outdoors? I have been wandering around the garden chucking sycamore seeds into the air all day! 

Comment

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

Contests

Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The third round was a reliablilty/aerial photography round for both planes and copters, which is now closed. Stay tuned for the next round, beginning soon.

A list of all T3 contests is here

 

© 2012   Created by Chris Anderson.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service