This week I took the Modular Test Platform (MTP) for it's maiden flight, I can't tell you how nervous I was to give it it's first throw, or how excited I was when I saw flying through the air! You all probably know what I mean.
I got 2 or 3 "OK" flights in (20-30 seconds) before it had gotten beaten up enough to not really fly anymore. With each crash though, I was expecting more damage, but those wooden dowels really add a lot of strength and rigidity, while the foam and hot glue give it some flexibility. Eventually, the motor section got so crushed that the motor was too unsecured to make additional flights.
The needed improvements are:
1.) Improve CG: at first it was tail heavy, causing the airplane to "high alpha" and not allow the wings to really generate lift. As I moved the battery toward the nose to shift the CG, things got better and better.
2.) Reduce control surfaces: even the smallest movement of my transmitter sticks would make the airplane almost lose control as it exerted a LOT of force. Either (or both!) the control surfaces need to be reduced in size or the throws need to be reduced.
3.) More power: the brushed motor, 10C NiMh x 7.2v battery, and 10 amp ESC set up has got to go. It was taken from a wild hawk, and while functional, the power system is heavy, weak, and inefficient. The new system will have a brushless motor, 20C 11.1v LiPo, and 30 amp ESC. I've already bench tested it and it has at least 5 - 6 times the thrust.
4.) Wing incidence: I also think adding a little angle on the wing will add natural stability and climb.
Next week I'll be making these and other improvements to the MTP. Anything I've missed?
Comment by d-creator on June 12, 2011 at 5:42am
Comment by S.G. Sutter on June 12, 2011 at 5:52am You're making great progress, Trent! Well done.
For point 1, a finely balanced CG will definitely help you. Point 2, could you adjust the expos on your transmitter to give you more fine control over the surfaces? Point 3, wow, yes, an updated powerplant will definitely help.
Personally I would hold off on #4 until you see how #1 - #3 impact your performance.
Comment by Russell B. Sutton on June 12, 2011 at 6:29am
Comment by Russell B. Sutton on June 12, 2011 at 7:22am Whats the flying weight of ur setup? 700 grams?
Move the CG forward quite a bit. You are carrying alot of dead weight with your tail arrangement. I think you should shape the tail and make it solid, rather than detachable to save some weight back there. Then you can reduce the length of the nose on the other side of the CG. I suspect you have it like that to counter the weight of the tail!
If you do add weight ie the camera rather add it in front of the CG better than behind.
You don't need to worry about expos, just push the sticks less. Reducing the size of surfaces will help to move the CG and the over control issues, would be simple as well.
As I have said before the only thing to add is lightness.
Not sure but you might have tipped stalled in on that first incident, so a little more speed in the turn.
I predict at the end of this series you will have a very capable airframe.
Well done.
Comment by Thon on June 12, 2011 at 7:55am
Comment by Trent at MyGeekShow on June 12, 2011 at 7:26pm I like this kid
Comment by Trent at MyGeekShow on June 19, 2011 at 6:06am I had a lot going on this week, and only had an hour or so to do my geek show. I tried a flight but didn't get the CG right and nosed it quick. I'll give it a better shot this week as well as start on the next airplane.
Comment by Russell B. Sutton on June 19, 2011 at 8:38am Comment
Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.203 members
24 members
207 members
58 members
1355 members
© 2013 Created by Chris Anderson.
Powered by

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!
Join DIY Drones