Results from the AUVSI autonomous boat competition


From Robots.net: "The 3rd annual AUVSI Autonomous Surface Vehicle Competition (ASVC) is over and first place went to the University of Michigan. The University of Central Florida took 2nd place and University of Rhode Island came in third. Check the ASVC website for complete results. You can watch more video of the the event online."

Views: 59

Comment by Bill Porter on June 16, 2010 at 3:26pm
Very cool.

Was this mostly a undergraduate event? I tried looking around their website but couldn't find out.

For the undergrad level, this seems like a good challenge, but if this is mostly graduate students, I'm not really impressed with the difficulty of the course.
Comment by Stephen Jack on June 18, 2010 at 4:39am
Some interesting stuff shame they teach 1990s Formula 1 ideology. One team fried a $7000 Lidar without consequences, instead they just pull another one off the shelf.

Not sure about the ethics of the AUVSI Foundation with competitions aimed at developing products to kill people. DIYDRONES still uses a logo of a vehicle thats main purpose is to kill indiscriminately, from several thousand feet. I thought this image was to be removed 9 months ago, am I wrong?

Is there a need for a Robotic Boat orientated forum?
eg. 'Das Boot Robotics Forum' after one of the finest boat films ever made directed by Wolfgang Petersen

Moderator
Comment by Sgt Ric on June 18, 2010 at 8:48am
Lets not start that again: alot of effort went into replacing the Predator drone, so lets just leave it at that!

"Guns don't kill people, people do"

AUVSI never professed to be military neutral... DIYDrones is!
Comment by Morli on June 18, 2010 at 10:36am
Stephen,
Ignorance is blessing some times but not always. Google & other search engines are our best friends. The Logo above is NASA's research vehicle called Ikhana , one of its application is given here. , and here.
Answer to second question: Yes you are wrong, It was not going to be removed. However ,Logo was updated to a better profile so that people ignorant of civilian UAVs in general will not confuse it with Predator or any mil UAVs. I see that it still fails some times. Like Sgt said , it is what men do. Knife for eg is one of the most common murder weapon in the world. Just Think about it.
Answer to third question:
Das boot... forum? We don't need to know . This forum's primary focus is on air vehicles only and once in a while we get some good posts from members on marine or land environment usage too.
Comment by Stephen Jack on June 18, 2010 at 3:41pm
Morli, Good use of the word ignorance. Softly now its a predator in outline. http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/predator/

http://diydrones.com/profiles/blogs/robotic-warfare

Comment by Chris Anderson on February 3, 2009 at 7:54am
A few responses:

1) Good point on the Predator picture. When I get back home next week I'll change it,
2) I agree that we can't ban military stuff entirely here, but we do try to keep it to a minimum. It's really not what this site is about and if we want the authorities off our back, we'll keep it that way,
3) Lance's post was not "deleted". He chose to take it down himself.
4) The news items on the bottom right column are autogenerated from an RSS feed from AUVSI. I don't control them.

With regard to "Guns don't kill people people do" how about looking at the big picture. It just makes War easier to sell to the public, War marketing is what its all about so society does not feel so bad about killing the odd hundred thousand civilians.

Moril Answer to third question
"Das boot... forum? We don't need to know . This forum's primary focus is on air vehicles only and once in a while we get some good posts from members on marine or land environment usage too."

"We don't need to know" (Thats one for the scrap book)

Lets get this right you are the unelected spokes person for increasingly sanitized forum? Next comments will be treated in the same way as blogs deleted if they don't tow the line.
Comment by Stephen Jack on June 18, 2010 at 3:44pm
PS Morli I think you should inform the author of the thread not to post any more on autonomous boats if it displeases you.

Moderator
Comment by Taylor Cox on June 18, 2010 at 3:58pm
@Stephen. Seems like your just trying to cause problems with something of extreme unimportance. I went to a high school with the Mascot the "Indians" and all the political idiots tried to get the school to change the name because it "offended" the indian tribes. Later we had the tribe Chief come in and he said he was proud that a school had a mascot named after the Indians. No one is going to come and join this site if their purpose is to go and kill a bunch of people. I don't see anywhere on the Diydrones store where they are selling weapons of mass destruction do you? And your complaining about a logo?? LMFAO

Moderator
Comment by Brian on June 18, 2010 at 4:08pm
One of the best reads on this site, for a lot of folks was a series regarding a robotic boat and the trials it took to get it setup. So YES there is a need because there is interest in the subject.
Comment by Morli on June 18, 2010 at 4:34pm
Sure Stephen , will do if I can make sense of your chatter. thanks for the link though. You should look for some thing more recent. Try
Here is one for you check current status ( for increasing required sensitization of this forum). I am sure this is the very reason Chris A had to come up with updated rules.

but what has all the below to do with the topic on the top?. where you the winner or part of winning or loosing team, judges in this competition mentioned above?
"
>>shame they teach 1990s Formula 1 ideology.
>> One team fried a $7000 Lidar without consequences, instead they just pull another one off the shelf. I would understand your concern if you were paying for it though.

>>Not sure about the ethics of the AUVSI Foundation with competitions aimed at developing products to kill people.
>>DIYDRONES still uses a logo of a vehicle thats main purpose is to kill indiscriminately, from several thousand feet. I thought this image was to be removed 9 months ago, am I wrong? check for later posts then the one you came up with. It was post too & was a small competition.

Is there a need for a Robotic Boat orientated forum?
eg. 'Das Boot Robotics Forum' after one of the finest boat films ever made directed by Wolfgang Petersen " ??????
I have no idea what you are talking about. Are you asking for a dedicated boat forum here?or are you saying " we don't need one? DIYdrones is DIY style autonomous drone interests forum. Most of the members like them flying, but if you want them to crawl or swim or roll , then you are most welcome to share your interest and experience. And if there is enough interest with lots of feed back from members who are interested to start a dedicated forum , then I am sure Chris A will add one more entry on the top that says 'Das Boot Robotics Forum' . Feel free to invite vote for it. There is one very good blog on autonomous catamaran in this forum. Check it out.
Comment by Bill Porter on June 18, 2010 at 5:08pm
I'm lost to how we went from boats that circle a blue buoy to boats that kill people. Maybe if a Smirf was swimming near it and got run over?

AUVSI started out as Autonomous Underwater Vehicles that do things like swim through circles and pick up treasure from the bottom. I don't see how on earth that could be misconstrued to anything other then peaceful.

And (at least at the place I work) you are not a true engineer until you destroy something 5 figures or over.

Comment

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

Contests

Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The third round was a reliablilty/aerial photography round for both planes and copters, which is now closed. Stay tuned for the next round, beginning soon.

A list of all T3 contests is here

 

© 2012   Created by Chris Anderson.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service