T3

The answer is:

since UAVs are supposed to fly gracefully,

if you pick a platform that is manageable in manual mode (not overly sluggish),

you can fly a machine of arbitrary size.

Also the stall recovery using rudder is intuitive.

IMO positive stability is not strictly required,

but for real-world applications aircraft stability and autopilot action should better be working together.

MultiplexFox (0.26kg, no payload, 20-45min enduirance, 45-55km/h)

Research plane - classified as Barely Flying Machine. -40deg glide slope when unpowered.

Autopilot is the supporting structure... (maybe World's first Intergral Autopilot Design ;-) )

EasyUAV (1.2kg AUW, 0.65kg empty weight, 20min-1h10 endurance, 35-45km/h)

Pteryx UAV (3.2-5kg AUW, 2.6kg empty weight, 20min-1h30 endurance, 40-55km/h)

Fully custom UAV for aerial photography, not available as a kit or in any other form.

(a joint development of AerialRobotics and TriggerComposites, www.pteryx.eu)

All can be hand-launched, however for Pteryx with over 4kg AUW

it is possible to use bungee launch if you want to operate reliably

even under stress.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • T3
    Thank you. We designed it based on aerial photo experiences: how to make assembly easier (2 nylon screws), maintenance and battery acccess (stable position upside-down), could be hand-launched at low payload, roll stabilisation combination of stability and damping to counter windgusts, must enclose the payload, must be able to accomodate various protections as the law wants it (sometimes limited radius & agl, maybe a parachute etc.) . It doesn't fit in the backpack - we wanted to avoid Raven syndrome (6 pieces or so) - in fact no single electrical connector has to be used. We are not rushing it but the assembly time in the field will land in the same region as in easystar.
  • Looking good Chris
  • T3
    Nice airframe!
  • Admin
    collab = Collaboration
  • Moderator
    Pretty looking aeroplane Chris that's always a good sign.
  • T3
    Pteryxpilot has stabilised camera mount support, parachute etc.
    The main reason for branching the development is to be able to assure the quality without cross-code interactions - there are no problems nor collisions for now but I don't want any in the future.
  • Admin
    pretty nice airframe :)) , i think they are same ,it is collab between AP and airframe company
  • T3
    Ahh thanks.
  • 3D Robotics
    PS: You've got the post as readable by "just my friends". If that was an accident and you want it to show up on the front page for all to see, just edit it and click on the read by "everyone" button.
  • 3D Robotics
    I'm confused. Is PteryxPilot a different AP than FlexiPilot?
This reply was deleted.